1. “20% error” is not one problem
Suppose an image classifier makes 200 mistakes:
80 blurry images
55 wrong labels
35 unusual viewpoints
20 tiny objects
10 other
A new architecture may not fix mislabeled data. Error categories turn a vague score into an engineering plan.
2. Inspect examples
For classification, study false positives and false negatives separately. Slice by meaningful groups: device type, geography, object size, sentence length, class, confidence, time period.
For regression, inspect the largest residuals and systematic patterns in residual plots.
3. Estimate the ceiling
If 27% of errors come from wrong labels, fixing modeling alone cannot recover all of them. If 60% come from low-resolution inputs, better data collection may beat another month of tuning.
4. Avoid post-hoc storytelling
Error analysis itself can overfit the validation set. Form hypotheses, make a change, and verify with untouched evidence or repeated experiments.
What to Remember
The aggregate metric tells you that the model fails. Error analysis helps tell you how and why.
Next → Hyperparameter Search: after identifying a real modeling problem, how should we search choices such as depth, learning rate and regularization?